On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:56 -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote: > All documentation should now be in the docs directory anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clala...@redhat.com> > --- > README | 150 > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 README >
ACK, however this brings up something I have been thinking about, wanted to see what others thought. I wonder if removing things like this from the specific repos might not be the way to go long term. It seems to me, that as we start to have more components working together (condor, image factory/warehouse, etc), it might remain useful for someone to be able to clone one of these repos and get the relevant docs for them. The point of moving things into the dcos repo was to make a central location to build the site from, but it was just aggregator and api when we did that - now things are a bit more distributed. I talked to Jim Meyering, and one of his suggestions was to have our build script for the site grab whatever files we want to include up there from other repos, but let those projects be the authority on what is in there. So the script could, for example, wget the latest README for condor for its repo, and wrap that in some navigation, etc. But if you clone condor repo directly, you still get the docs you need. Any strong opinions either way? -j _______________________________________________ deltacloud-devel mailing list deltacloud-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/deltacloud-devel
