Suggestions for another name? Or does the list think we should just go with @Typed?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 13:36, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>wrote: > we discussed such a feature for codi and didn't add it because of @Typed() > > @jason: > imo @Veto is the wrong name (if there is no real veto) > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2011/12/14 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > > > Sort of, it doesn't really veto the bean though. You could still inject > it > > by using the concrete type. > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 13:24, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Of course, the CDI-1.0 way to do this out of the box would be a > > > > > > @Typed() > > > > > > It has a bit a different mechanic, but basically serves the same goal. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Jason Porter <[email protected]> > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Cc: > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 9:05 PM > > > > Subject: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto > > > > > > > > As per [1] we're discussing the top features from both CODI (core) > and > > > > Solder. > > > > > > > > This issue is for @Veto [2] from Solder. > > > > > > > > Basic idea: > > > > Provide an easy way for application developers to veto beans in their > > > > application. Of course users could create their own Extension and > veto > > > that > > > > way, this does all the boilerplate for them. All the users need to do > > is > > > > annotate the bean(s), or the package in package-info.java and the > > bean(s) > > > > (all in the package if annotated at the package level) will be > vetoed. > > > > > > > > The suggestion is to keep the feature as it currently stands, > > > essentially a > > > > copy / paste (package name change) from Solder. > > > > > > > > Please send +1 +0 -1 for this proposal. > > > > > > > > If you have *basic* objections please add them to [3] > > > > > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/3.1.0.CR1/reference/en-US/html/solder-programmingmodel.html#d0e338 > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > > > > -- > > > > Jason Porter > > > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > > > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > > > > > > > Software Engineer > > > > Open Source Advocate > > > > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling > > > > > > > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > > > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > > > Software Engineer > > Open Source Advocate > > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling > > > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > > > -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
