oki, where would you add those BOMs? Create an own project (similar to the bundles)? Or add them as mixins?
LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:20 PM > Subject: Re: intermediate vcs > >T hat's a good point, though another thing to consider is optional 3rd party > dependencies. For example, Seam JCR (which will possibly become DeltaSpike > JCR eventually) can be used with either JackRabbit or ModeShape, or Seam > Reports can be used with a number of different reporting engines. Having > the versions for these defined in the bom will make life much easier for > the user. > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since we always release all of DeltaSpike in one go, the versions are >> always the same. This is really convenient to just add a property >> >> >> <properties> >> <deltaspike.version>0.1-SNAPSHOT</deltaspike.version> >> >> </properties> >> >> >> and use that for all your project. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> >> >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg > <[email protected] >> > >> >Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:10 PM >> >Subject: Re: intermediate vcs >> > >> > >> >At the bare minimum it can contain all of the DeltaSpike module > versions. >> Even if they're all the same, it still adds convenience. >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >yes, that sounds good. But is sometimes really heavily depending on the >> container you let this run in. So that part might become tricky. >> >> >> >>We should add it on our todo list for later evaluation. >> >> >> >>LieGrue, >> >>strub >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>________________________________ >> >>> From: Shane Bryzak <[email protected]> >> >>>To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg < >> [email protected]> >> >>>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:03 PM >> >>>Subject: Re: intermediate vcs >> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>Looking pretty good. Do you think we should add a BOM (Bill Of >> Materials) containing all of the dependencies and versions? We find that >> it makes life much easier for our users if they can simply import the bom >> and not have to worry about dependency version hell. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Mark Struberg > <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>I started with the initial project structure and some maven > stuff. >> >>>> >> >>>>I followed the intended structure from our Wiki. >> >>>> >> >>>>Please review. >> >>>> >> >>>>LieGrue, >> >>>>strub >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >> >>>>> From: Gerhard Petracek > <[email protected]> >> >>>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>>> Cc: >> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:52 AM >> >>>>> Subject: intermediate vcs >> >>>>> >> >>>>> hi @ all, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> since we have started several discussions, it makes > sense to >> prototype some >> >>>>> parts immediately. >> >>>>> mark and i suggest to start at [1] while the infra > team is preparing >> our >> >>>>> repository, ldap group,... >> >>>>> if you would like to join, send your user-name and you > will be added. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> regards, >> >>>>> gerhard >> >>>>> >> >>>>> [1] http://goo.gl/HmNBV >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >
