+1 for @Veto Alignment with the CDI spec makes sense.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for @Veto > > > a.) because it's already established in Seam3 -> easier to transit Seam > projects > b.) because this will also be used in the CDI-1.1 spec itself [1]. Thus users > will be familiar with it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > [1] > https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/blob/479e144ccfa0235faf5662355d02a7fe5f6725f6/api/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/Veto.java > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 12:41 AM >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto >> >> it looks like @Exclude is the alternative which would work for several of >> us. >> -> we have to choose between @Exclude and @Vote >> >> +1 for @Exclude >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2011/12/26 Jakob Korherr <[email protected]> >> >>> +1 to @Veto and @Exclude >>> >>> Also I agree with Pete's comments about the other suggestions. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> 2011/12/24 Pete Muir <[email protected]>: >>> > We chose @Veto originally, as it didn't deviate from the >> spec's veto() >>> method, so should be less of a learning curve. I don't like @Deactivate >> as >>> it makes it sound like you have to activate other beans. @Ignore is too >>> overloaded a term for me to be comfortable with it (@IgnoreWarnings). I >>> like @Exclude as it's closest to what makes most intuitive sense. >>> > >>> > On 24 Dec 2011, at 09:33, Christian Kaltepoth wrote: >>> > >>> >> Perhaps we should build a list of all suggestions and then start a >>> >> vote which one to use. >>> >> >>> >> I think these are the names that were suggested: >>> >> >>> >> @Veto >>> >> @Skip >>> >> @Exclude >>> >> @Deactivate >>> >> @Ignore >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 2011/12/23 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>: >>> >>> hi arne, >>> >>> >>> >>> would be also ok for me -> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> gerhard >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2011/12/23 Arne Limburg <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>>> What about @Exclude? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Cheers, >>> >>>> Arne >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> >>>> Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28 >>> >>>> An: [email protected] >>> >>>> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto >>> >>>> >>> >>>> +0.5 for @Skip >>> >>>> as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from >> a technical >>> >>>> perspective, but it sounds strange for users who >> aren't aware of the >>> >>>> mechanism behind. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> if we are talking only about @Veto vs @Skip and not about >> the other >>> >>>> alternatives: +1 for @Skip >>> >>>> >>> >>>> regards, >>> >>>> gerhard >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 2011/12/23 Dan Allen <[email protected]> >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Veto is rationally the most appropriate since it >> directly translates >>> >>>>> to calling ProcessAnnotatedType#veto() >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> However, I'd like to offer one other alternative: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> @Skip >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> While veto describes what the extension is doing >> internally, skip is >>> >>>>> how the developer perceives the result of the action. >> The class is >>> >>>>> "skipped over" during the scanning process. >> This is similar to the >>> >>>>> suggestion @Ignore, and I think both would get the >> point across >>> equally >>> >>>> well. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -Dan >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> p.s. Apologizes for dropping the rest of the thread. I >> wasn't >>> >>>>> receiving messages when this thread started. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> Dan Allen >>> >>>>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam >> in Action >>> >>>>> Registered Linux User #231597 >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about >>> >>>>> http://mojavelinux.com >>> >>>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Christian Kaltepoth >>> >> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ >>> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jakob Korherr >>> >>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >>> work: http://www.irian.at >>> >>
