No, au contraire - each committer _must_ push himself if possible! LieGrue, strub
----- Original Message ----- > From: John D. Ament <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 12:42 AM > Subject: Re: suggested git workflow/s > > As long as it is not required that we have specific named branches and > someone else has to push in code, I'm ok with the proposed git flow in the > wiki. > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jason Porter > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Shall we start those discussions now? Might as well. >> >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:00, Gerhard Petracek >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > hi @ all, >> > >> > mark added some additional suggestions to the wiki [1]. >> > >> > besides that we have to discuss further topics like: >> > - file encoding >> > - line-endings >> > - usage of special characters >> > >> > regards, >> > gerhard >> > >> > [1] >> > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Suggested+Git+Workflows >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Jason Porter >> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >> >> Software Engineer >> Open Source Advocate >> Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling >> >> PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >> >
