+1! regards, gerhard
2012/1/25 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >> -1 to i18n and typesafe logging for version one. > >> > > > > Lincoln, why you hatin' on type-safe logging? Brother, hook me up with a > +1 > > :) > > > > -Dan > > > > Hehe, that's the nice thing here at Apache. > Since we only discuss those things on strictly technical levels we are > still all brothers, even if we get some -1 sometimes :) > > Don't worry Dan, if there are diverse opinions, then we have passed the > test for the first lesson: free thinking :) > > Having some +1 and -1 in an early discussion phase only means one thing: > we need more arguments. > > Lincoln, most of the times (at least if you see that a few people already > casted +1 for some idea) it's very helpful if you underline your -1 with > technical arguments means "_why_ you don't like type-safe logging" and/or > the requirements you would have for such a feature to be successful. > > Most votes here are majority votes [1], but I've seen it many times that > (even after there are already lots of +1 on the table) a single person > outlined a problem and did cast -1. And if the argument is valid, it's > pretty often the case that the others recall their +1 and change it to -1 > as well. > > It's really all about the arguments. > > LieGrue, > strub > > [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >
