@module name:
i agree with pete! here is my -0.5 for "container" in the name.
imo we need a name which makes clear that this module is just needed with
java-se.

furthermore, we should use unified names for the test modules.

regards,
gerhard



2012/2/18 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]>

> +1
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
>
> 2012/2/18 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I've now drafted a first version of the API
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/struberg/incubator-deltaspike/blob/containerctrl/deltaspike/containerctrl/api/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/containerctrl/api/ContainerControl.java
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> I think it's now clear that we only need this for built-in scopes, but
>> it's really nice to provide that way.
>> Pete, I don't get the argument with CDI<T> because it doesn't offer
>> anything close to the functionality of the ContainerControl.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Pete Muir <[email protected]>
>> > To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <
>> [email protected]>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:31 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] bootstrap api
>> >
>> > Aha, so this is "mixing" bootstrap and context lifecycle management?
>> > If so, I would prefer we keep these as two separate APIs. I can make a
>> proposal
>> > for a context lifecycle management api based on what we have in Weld.
>> >
>> > On 15 Feb 2012, at 17:17, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> >
>> >>  Hi Pete!
>> >>
>> >>  fluent api is fine for me.
>> >>
>> >>  The reason why the context control is so fine granular is that you
>> > don't have any well defined extension points in an SE app. Thus the
>> > application must perform those steps itself.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  Imagine a Swing App.
>> >>  A Request could be a user interaction.
>> >>
>> >>  A Conversation could start when a multi-page dialogue gets opened and
>> ends
>> > when it will finally be stored.
>> >>  etc.
>> >>  Of course for custom scopes this needs to be refined or the Extension
>> > providing this scope must allow us to control this.
>> >>
>> >>  LieGrue,
>> >>  strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>  From: Pete Muir <[email protected]>
>> >>>  To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg
>> > <[email protected]>
>> >>>  Cc:
>> >>>  Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:59 PM
>> >>>  Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] bootstrap api
>> >>>
>> >>>  My first thoughts:
>> >>>
>> >>>  * the API should be fluent - always return an instance of the
>> bootstrap
>> > API
>> >>>  class
>> >>>  * I would prefer to avoid the use of the word container, on the whole
>> > the spec
>> >>>  avoids that term as it's overloaded
>> >>>  * I'm unsure of why you want to start the contexts with such
>> > granularity,
>> >>>  and want to understand the use cases better. I'm not really sure
>> > why you
>> >>>  want to control this outside the main start/stop methods...
>> >>>  * I would prefer start/stop to boot/shutdown - again, slightly less
>> > meaning
>> >>>  attached to the terms which might be confusing
>> >>>  * Make sure that this class has the same methods as the CDI class
>> from
>> > CDI 1.1,
>> >>>  so that we don't make people change their API too much
>> >>>
>> >>>  On 10 Feb 2012, at 17:35, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>  Hi!
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  Thats perfectly fine. Keep the ideas rolling ;)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  The original API was intended for doing a quick cdi boot for unit
>> > testing,
>> >>>  thus it might miss some features.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  LieGrue,
>> >>>>  strub
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>> >>>>>  From: Pete Muir <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>  To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg
>> >>>  <[email protected]>
>> >>>>>  Cc:
>> >>>>>  Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:11 PM
>> >>>>>  Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] bootstrap api
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  +1 to the idea but I would want to discuss the API in quite a
>> > lot of
>> >>>  detail.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  On 9 Feb 2012, at 10:13, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>  Hi!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  I developed an API to bootstrap and control CDI containers
>> > from
>> >>>  within a SE
>> >>>>>  application [1].
>> >>>>>>  This was originally developed to make OpenWebBeans SE
>> > applications
>> >>>  easily
>> >>>>>  testable, but it also can be used for SE applications in
>> > general!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  There is already an implementation for OpenWebBeans [2] and
>> > it
>> >>>  would be
>> >>>>>  really easy to also provide the same for various Weld versions.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  wdyt? Could be nice to import this as
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  core/bootstrap/api
>> >>>>>>  core/bootstrap/owb
>> >>>>>>  and add a new
>> >>>>>>  core/bootstrap/weld
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  LieGrue,
>> >>>>>>  strub
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>  [1]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-test/cditest/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/cditest/
>> >>>>>>  [2]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-test/cditest-owb/
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to