hi alan, no - after the security check the state is VIOLATION_FOUND or NO_VIOLATION_FOUND (see invokeVoters in [1]).
regards, gerhard [1] http://s.apache.org/xa 2012/3/18 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > Is it thought that the "ongoing security check" is some relatively longer > running conversation that exists longer than the vote in which the voters > participate? > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Mar 17, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > hi alan, > > > > e.g.: > > in myfaces codi it is used in custom cdi-contexts. they can check the > state > > and in case of an ongoing security check, the scope shouldn't change its > > internal state. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2012/3/17 Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> > > > >> In DELTASPIKE-64 there's a paragraph that states: > >> > >>> in addition an AccessDecisionVoterContext is needed to detect if there > >> is an ongoing security check (e.g. it's possible to use it in a custom > >> scope to avoid that a security check postpones the expiration). > >> > >> > >> I'm sure that I'm being dense but can someone provide a little bit more > >> detail what this means? is the "ongoing security check amongst voters" > the > >> current vote or is there a larger process in motion? > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Alan > >> > >> > >
