> [+1] Drop it, our code will get complicated enough anyway +1 LieGrue, strub
PS: vote is open for 72h with lazy consensus ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > To: deltaspike <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 6:44 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Converter framework > > a.) What is this for? -> no one knows > b.) Do we need it in DeltaSpike? -> not yet. > c.) Do we need it for JSF? -> No, JSF has it's own Converter logic > d.) Do we need it somewhere else? -> No, not afaik > > So let's drop the Converter stuff which is currently of no use and really > complicated to get right? > Just remember that this was more or less a 1:1 copy of the Spring logic which > has not so easily extendible producer methods. > > [+1] Drop it, our code will get complicated enough anyway > > [+0] Meh, don't care > > [-1] keep it because it is very important (+ give use case and reasons) > > LieGrue, > strub >
