hi @ all, since our plan is to get deltaspike in a good shape by v0.9, it's imo pretty obvious that we have to start with the jsf module soon (as well as with some other modules) and nobody questioned it so far. however, in view of planned features for release x nothing is a "must". we are a community centric open-source project and nothing else.
since we communicate that until v1 even apis can change, we will see some early adaptors and people who start to experiment with it (which is great and important). however, imo most users will join after the api is stable. at least that's also what i hear on a regular basis - users are very interested in deltaspike, but they will (or have to) wait until it's stable. for now it's way more important to move on faster as a (dev-)community (independent of the topic). it's really very important to get more reviewers during the dev process. besides code-reviews also the documentation, examples,... are very important. we just can do it fast(er), if more people join the effort actively. right now we have about 4 (of more than 20) committers who join the effort on a regular basis. getting new contributors (and therefore potential committers) is important, but as a >short term< goal i would be happy to see more activity from existing committers. regards, gerhard 2012/7/3 Mehdi Heidarzadeh <[email protected]> > +1 for starting with JSF in 0.4 > > I think for 0.4, JSF is a must because most developers can start to use > Deltaspike since jsf is included in Deltaspike. > > -- > Mehdi Heidarzadeh Ardalani > Independent JEE Consultant, Architect and Developer. > http://www.TheBigJavaBlog.com >
