On 12-07-06 3:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
IMO cdi-query is more important than any integration with a third party
(spring, osgi..)
Wdyt?
I think that one shouldn't exclude the other, as committers and
contributors can focus on different areas of interest.
Le 6 juil. 2012 21:21, "Marius Bogoevici" <[email protected]> a
écrit :
All,
I know that it is a final the final stretch for 0.3 so all the energy is
flowing in that direction, however, as a 0.4 release is brewing, I think it
is a good moment to discuss whether a Spring bridge should be included in
the 0.4 release. I believe that such a module should be included now, based
on the fact that Java EE 6 is gaining momentum, and a number of developers
I recently encountered have asked about ways to reuse their existing Spring
codebase with the newly available features in Java EE 6. It is possible to
direct people to Seam Spring and such, however it is clear from the start
that those libraries will need to be replaced soon.
So, I'd like to start a more in-depth discussion about features and
design. An early glimpse is on the wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/**
DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-**integration.html<https://cwiki.apache.org/DeltaSpike/spring-cdi-integration.html>,
but that is mostly providing a frame of refernence.
I plan to start the discussion over the weekend, or as early as possible
next week, but IMO for it to make sense the first step is clarifying that
such a module could potentially be included on the 0.4 roadmap (knowing
that the roadmap for 0.4 is yet to be defined). As I said, from my point of
view this is a critically important item, and can be addressed now, given
how the general-purpose facilities of DeltaSpike are in place.
WDYT?
Cheers,
Marius
