+0 regards, gerhard
2012/8/12 Cody Lerum <[email protected]> > +0 > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jason Porter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +0 > > > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Herzog <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> +1 from me > >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Arne Limburg [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Gesendet: Samstag, 11. August 2012 18:18 > >> An: [email protected]; Mark Struberg > >> Betreff: Re: @SuppressWarning(unchecked) and likes > >> > >> +1 from me, too > >> > >> > >> Am 11.08.12 17:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <[email protected]>: > >> > >> >Hi! > >> > > >> >Is it really necessary to have this suppress annotation in all of our > >> >sources? > >> >This stuff is most times even IDE specific, and I honestly see no > >> >reason for having it. > >> > > >> >If someone doesn't like the warnings in some IDEs, then just disable it > >> >in your configuration. > >> >But I see no reason for instead adding the suppression marker to each > >> >and every class. > >> > > >> >I'm all for +1 to remove it. > >> >wdyt? > >> > > >> >LieGrue, > >> >strub > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Jason Porter > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > > > Software Engineer > > Open Source Advocate > > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling > > > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >
