Hello, I just learned (on linuxfr.org) that TLA (aka GNU Arch) has been dropped by Tom Lord, its main developer.
As I'm using Arch to manage demexp source code, it is going to be an issue in the long term. In the short term, Arch is available and it does not seem to have particular blocking bug (except its user interface, but this is probably a "feature"). The obvious remplacement is Bazaar and Bazaar-ng, a fork of Arch sponsored by Canonical Ltd. (the firm behind Ubuntu Linux). But Thomas (Petazzoni) pointed me to Mercurial which seems quite interesting: fast (an important point for me after testing Arch), decentralized and with a simple interface. I've not taken any decision yet, but it is always fun to play with a new SCM, so be assured I'll break all existing repositories. ;) Of course, I'll be glad to hear any opinion on the relative merit of other SCM. My 0.2 € opinion on other SCM: - GIT: too complicated, just manage source trees (i.e. not really an SCM), too tied to linux kernel; - Subversion (svn): really nice but centralized; - Darcs: after finding it interesting, I finally don't like its theory of commutating change set: too complicated (and complexity means issues); - Monotone: I don't know it, no opinion; - Aegis: too complicated, relies too much on Unix. A nightmare to setup and centralized; - CVS: don't even think about it! ;) Yours, d.
_______________________________________________ Demexp-dev mailing list Demexp-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/demexp-dev
