Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:05:12PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote:
> In fact, svk is very interesting: it keeps compatibility with > What is the current version of SVK in sid? 1.05? 1.06? (I can't check 1.06 (PTS is not down though): http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/svk.html > Would it be doable for you to do a backport of latest svk debian > package to sarge? If it's difficult or you have other things to do, > I'll try a manual install. I tried (with all the necessary dependencies) and the tests fail in the following way. If you have any clue... t/06keyword..................NOK 21# Failed test (t/06keyword.t at line 99) # got: 'native # ' # expected: 'native # ' t/06keyword..................ok 24/27Use of uninitialized value in <HANDLE> at /tmp/buildd/svk-1.06/blib/lib/SVK/Command/Propset.pm line 99. readline() on unopened filehandle at /tmp/buildd/svk-1.06/blib/lib/SVK/Command/Propset.pm line 99. t/06keyword..................NOK 25# Failed test (t/06keyword.t at line 130) # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[0] = Does not exist # $expected->[0] = 'M t/checkout/keyword/le/mixed2' t/06keyword..................NOK 26# Failed test (t/06keyword.t at line 137) # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[0] = Does not exist # $expected->[0] = 'M t/checkout/keyword/le/mixed2' t/06keyword..................ok 27/27# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 27. t/06keyword..................dubious Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300) DIED. FAILED tests 21, 25-26 Failed 3/27 tests, 88.89% okay (less 4 skipped tests: 20 okay, 74.07%) On the topic, personally, I favour mercurial (and tailor to move from one SCM to an other). Best regards, Frédéric _______________________________________________ Demexp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/demexp-dev
