Hello Lionel, "David MENTRE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Other have suggested P2P demexp servers. I would like to keep sci-fi > suggestions after the 1.0 release. ;) Well, after all, you are free to submit any suggestion that suits you. But they won't probably be taken into account unless joined with suitable patches. > I hope you understand my position but, in turn, feel free to disagree. > As Felix posts have shown, I don't think at all the options. My > position could seem a bit boring (and doing code that handles all > error cases *is* boring :-) but I think this makes the difference > between code that indeed works and unmanageable software. Well, once again, it seems that I have frightened a demexp incomer. Just for my own edification, which part(s) did you disliked in my answer? Best wishes, d. -- pub 1024D/A3AD7A2A 2004-10-03 David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562 D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A _______________________________________________ Demexp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/demexp-dev
