Hello Jérémy, 2007/1/12, Jeremy Dubreil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
In some cases this might lead to something we would wish to avoid. Indeed, if a voter A tries to delegate the question Q to the other participants then he can infer who is on a path of delegation to him. And in the same time he can find out who is not delegating to him whenever the delegation is accepted. Also, A communicating with some other participants can more information about the delegation graph.
That's a good question. I haven't thought about those kind of issues. Delegation is much more complicated than I thought, even for this "simple" case. ;-) The main issue is how to reveal information about delegation for two kinds of votes : - vote as a participant (private, void if the participant has delegated his vote); - vote as a delegate (public). Unfortunalty, the two kinds of vote are interweaved and have effect one on the other (as you are pointing out). I currently don't have a clear picture of the issue or even of what it is necessary to have.
May be you discussed this situation before, I didn't read everything so far.
I don't think so. Best wishes, d. _______________________________________________ Demexp-dev mailing list Demexp-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/demexp-dev
