Hi, On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > [ I'm wondering what's the correct usage of the mailing-lists ? Is > demexp-dev supposed to be an english-speaking mailing-list ? What's the > difference with demexp-en ? Is demexp-dev technical, and demexp-en a > mailing-list for the broader political project ?
Yes, exactly. > I do not provide x86_64 yet. Frederic Lehobey should quite soon provide > PowerPC and SPARC binaries, but no one said that he would provide x86_64 Yes. Let's say end of the week (if debootstrap problems in sid are over) for powerpc and sparc. :) > >This is all a bit messy, Debian doesn't support x86_64 yet, > >and only recently has the patched ocamlopt been added > >to the Debian archive .. kind of curious since Debian > >will never build it (but the Ubuntu rewrap does). > > Debian doesn't officially support x86_64, but unofficial Sarge ISOs are > available for this architecture, which is well maintained. Some links: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianAMD64 https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-amd64/ > >I had one heck of a time trying to build demexp from > >source due to all the dependencies, some of them > >not building properly on x86_64. I also can't get > >GODI to work at the moment from CVS. > > All dependencies are already packaged in Debian, so, using the demexp > work I've done (which is available through SVN), you should be able to > produce x86_64 binaries without too much trouble. > > If you're interested in doing so, let me know, and I'll try to give more > details about it. If you were to give such details to John, please also send copies to the -dev list for future reference. # apt-get build-deb ... might be of help. Experimentally, Frederic -- Demexp-en mailing list. To unsubscribe, click on this link: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
