On Mar 23, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Richard Shann <[email protected]>
wrote:
I agree. We perhaps ought to call this 0.9.0 since I get the
impression
people find the numbering misleading. In particular, since we now have
Undo I think people will be surprised that the numbering change is so
minor 0.8.22 -> 0.8.24
I would still like to see the closing unsaved dialog re-written
though -
What should it look like/do? Is there any other programs I should model?
Jeremiah
are there any other outstanding problems? - Nils has reported a
strange
cairo load crash a couple of times, but we have no idea what might
trigger it.
Richard
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 17:14 +0100, Nils Gey wrote:
Hello fellow list members,
Maybe we should prepare a release more sooner than later?
I just realised that possible students or other people interested
through the SoC might want to have a look at Denemo now and we came
pretty far in the last two month.
Nils
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
