I will work on it tonight. Jeremiah
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 12:02 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> I fixed the crash and the widgets are packed. >I'm not sure which stage you are at, but after git pull right now I see >these > * The Score->Score Properties is crashing > * The Scheme window does not pack properly (you can only get half > the text area, the rest is assigned to the CLI and Execute > buttons). >I haven't been able to check the Audio Input boxes because my >installation won't open the portaudio default, I am not trying to fix >this as the GSOC work is not complete. > >Richard > > >> I can revert the gtk_containers back to gtk_box_pack if you like. I will >> probably not have time until monday to do this reversion though. It tested >> it and it looks fine to me. It can look better but I think I can polish it >> with some of the other gtk_container functions. The gtk_container_add just >> uses gtk packing defaults. Any dialog has a space called the content area >> where widgets can be packed. I am just placing a vbox in the content area >> and then packing all the other widgets into the vbox. >> >> Jeremiah >> >> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T >> >> Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:24 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> >> I will take of the crash tonight. >> >I see you have made one commit. Are you fixing all the issues from the >> >merge? Score Properties dialog and GtkBox->GtkContainer issues...? >> >Richard >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Jeremiah >> >> >> >> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T >> >> >> >> Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 10:57 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> >> >> I switched because dialogs no longer have an accessable ->vbox member >> >> >> anymore. I also thought gtk_container looked cleaner then >> >> >> gtk_box_pack. >> >> >OK, that was a mistake. Containers are a much more primitive thing, they >> >> >don't allow you to control the way the sub-widgets are arranged and how >> >> >much of the available space they take. In fact, IIRC, you can (or could >> >> >in gtk2) only have one widget inside a container. >> >> >Can you look again at how you do the placement of GtkVBox and HBoxes now >> >> >in gtk3 - some sort of accessor function for the ->vbox member I would >> >> >imagine? >> >> > >> >> >Also, there is an immediate crash on trying Score->Score Properties. >> >> >Smells of memory corruption again :( >> >> > >> >> >The Educational->CreateButton problem is not due to the migration, it is >> >> >a bug I introduced trying to fix the problem of displaying titles (like >> >> >Pavana & Galliarda Dolorosa) that include characters that mean something >> >> >as markup (sorry). I am not sure how to handle this for best - it may be >> >> >we will need to set a flag to indicate whether the display field >> >> >contains markup or not... I'll think this over. >> >> > >> >> >Richard >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> Jeremiah >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T >> >> >> >> >> >> Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >I see this bug. Another one (introduced by you packing of boxes >> >> >> >changes >> >> >> >to container) is that the scheme script window does not expand >> >> >> >properly >> >> >> >- the buttons expand as well. What forced you to change from vbox,hbox >> >> >> >to GtkContainer? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Richard >> >> >> > >> >> >> >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 08:31 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> >> >> >> When testing educational-Note Reading-Line and space recognition, I >> >> >> >> get >> >> >> >> unformatted buttons. So the buttons looks something like: >> >> >> >> <b>help</b> >> >> >> >> instead of having a bold help. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Jeremiah >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> >> Denemo-devel mailing list >> >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
