That would be a lot more coherent!
2013/5/27 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 13:51 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote: > > I did wonder about replacing Print with Typeset, but decided > > against it > > because naive users would not understand, they think "I want > > to print > > this" and are only vaguely aware of the need to typeset it > > first. > > True, naive users don't need, and probably don't want to know this. > > > > > > OTOH I > > stopped popping up the printer dialog for every "Print" > > command, because > > people want to examine the typesetting and probably tweak it > > before > > actually invoking Print, which they will do from the Print > > View (which I > > did consider naming Typeset View, but again decided against > > it), after > > they have looked through the typeset score. > > > > Richard > > > > > > Maybe this step can be called "preview" (preview part, preview with > > ambitus etc.). Commands about png or pdf generation could be called > > "export". That would leave the word "print" for printing only. > > Yes, that would be possible, we could relabel the current Print menu as > Preview menu, and move the d-Print command out of it into the File menu. > > Richard > > > -- Éloi Rivard - [email protected] « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
