On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 22:08 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sat, 2013-06-01 at 18:54 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 11:34 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/5/27 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > > > Ah, yes, there are still some commands that are using the old > > > route, > > > running an external viewer on a generated file. I have not got > > > round to > > > doing anything about those. Can anyone interested say if there > > > is a good > > > reason to keep this external pdf view (and indeed the external > > > png > > > viewer) code around? > > > > > > Richard > > > Are you only talking about the png viewer, or the png export ? > > > > I shouldn't have mentioned the png viewer, as we don't have an internal > > png viewer. I have gone over the print menu now, I think the external > > pdf viewer should now be obsolete. > > In fact, I think I have removed the last vestiges of it now. > > > There is still some thinking needed > > about the png generation which could be treated as a purely export > > feature, even though an external viewer is being called up to show the > > png (?) > > Something like displaying the .png and offering a filechooser to rename > the .png to. Eloi , Well I tried adapting the code from the remove-viewers branch to do this but hit the snag of the main loop stopping which you reported before. So I have just issued a message giving the file location and opening the viewer. All this is now in the Export menu. I don't think it is worth putting more effort in on this. Enabling people to find the command they want is far more important - another case of someone struggling to find a command came up today.
Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
