I can restart the release process. Is the fix in git? Should I recreate the
branch or just checkout the changed file?

Jeremiah
On Aug 27, 2013 1:18 PM, "Richard Shann" <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 12:15 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > I updated the version numbers and created a branch.
> I downloaded the 1.0.8 tarball you created in denemo.org/downloads and
> built it as a new user. It seems fine apart from one minor issue. The
> default startup scheme script (actions/Default.scm) creates buttons
> using markup for the labels. I suspect this has gone in gtk3, as they
> are not showing properly.
> I don't mind re-starting the release process (it doesn't affect the
> translations) if you are happy to, or to leave it as is.
>
> Richard
>
>
> > I am going to work on building librubberband in gub now.
> >
> > Jeremiah
> >
> > On Aug 27, 2013 9:29 AM, "Richard Shann" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >         On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 08:24 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >         > I am ready now. Gub is still relying on gtk2 and guile 1.8
> >         for the
> >         > binaries though.
> >
> >         >
> >         That's fine, as long as I remember to check that the binaries
> >         are
> >         working ok. Have you been able to gub the librubberband yet? I
> >         haven't
> >         been able to build with gub since I updated to Debian Wheezy;
> >         my next
> >         attempt in that direction will be to start from scratch with
> >         your github
> >         but I haven't got to trying that yet - I seem to recall it is
> >         quite a
> >         battle. The rubberband library should build under gub ok,
> >         though it may
> >         need the .pc file patching (they wrote Cflags where they meant
> >         CFlags
> >         and so the include file wasn't found).
> >
> >         Richard
> >
> >         >
> >         > Jeremiah
> >         >
> >         > On Aug 27, 2013 6:03 AM, "Richard Shann"
> >         <[email protected]>
> >         > wrote:
> >         >         Even though we have only recently released 1.0.6 I
> >         think we
> >         >         should
> >         >         proceed without delay to 1.0.8
> >         >         One reason is because release 1.0.6 if built with
> >         guile 2.0
> >         >         will not
> >         >         execute many commands, Upbeat in particular. I have
> >         fixed this
> >         >         since
> >         >         moving on to guile 2 myself.
> >         >         The other is, of course, the transcription from
> >         Audio feature.
> >         >
> >         >         Please say when you are happy to push through
> >         another release
> >         >         and I will
> >         >         update the po files in preparation.
> >         >
> >         >         Richard
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         _______________________________________________
> >         >         Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         >         [email protected]
> >         >         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel

Reply via email to