It certainly looks good, but I haven't yet understood what exactly is being built with success... surely not a windows installer? I am hunting down some serious-looking trouble with the commands loading - some commands are simply not getting loaded, and saving new commands is not working properly. I expected this to be related to the alphabeticalizing of commands but it seems it is not. I'm afraid it is down to the re-factoring of the command load/storage into separate xml and scm parts, or some such. I am not sure which commands don't get loaded (Edit->Select->DeleteSelectionLeaveEmpty is one, which causes Edit->Delete to fail) and how important they are; so I don't know if the release should stand yet.
Richard On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 16:06 +0100, Éloi Rivard wrote: > I got back the denemo account on github. So here is a mirror of denemo > repository : > https://github.com/denemo/denemo > > It is updated every 5 minutes by my server. You can see the travis > status on this page : > https://travis-ci.org/denemo/denemo > > > So each time anyone commits on any branch, you can check a few minutes > later on Travis if the commit compiles. > > Great, isn't it ? > > > > 2013/10/28 Éloi Rivard <[email protected]> > Hey GTK3 for windows has been officially released ! > http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php > > > > 2013/10/23 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > I thought so at one time, but the developers of code > such as GTK do not > anticipate people doing this, and so it never gets > tested. > We tried and got *very* close to a static build for > Denemo cross > compiling for windows using the mxe project. I was > actually able to run > Denemo under a (statically compiled) gdb on windows. > In fact, I am still > able to run our current Denemo builds under that > gdb.exe which I kept > around. That is the beauty of a statically built > executable, it carries > on working forever, more or less. > You will need to look back at the emails about this - > my memory doesn't > serve me well enough to give a blow-by-blow account of > what happened :( > they all refer to mxe I expect. > > Richard > > > > > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 10:17 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote: > > Well, is gub mandatory ? Could it be possible to > statically compile > > every dependencies and just link them ? > > > > > > > > 2013/10/23 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > > On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 09:19 +0200, Éloi > Rivard wrote: > > > Travis run on a Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Server > Edition 64 bit. > > > > > > I think this could require quite a bit of > delving into GUB to > > get the > > build working - I am not sure what the > LilyPond project uses, > > but > > Jeremiah has been using Debian's stable > distribution on 32-bit > > architecture (but possibly slightly old in > some way since I > > was able to > > build using the previous Debian Stable > distro on my 64 bit > > architecture > > and then found it would no longer work, > apparently because of > > an > > optimizer bug in gcc, failing to build > libxml2). > > > > I don't want to sound pessimistic (I often > do!) but GUB is > > very large, > > especially when it is building Denemo (with > LilyPond, > > Ghostscript, font > > generation, even LilyPond documentation > generation thrown > > in)... > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Éloi Rivard - [email protected] > > > > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. » > > > > > > > > > -- > Éloi Rivard - [email protected] > > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. » > > > > > -- > Éloi Rivard - [email protected] > > « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. » > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
