This article might be interesting :
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/12/17/how_to_create_new_release_of_rpm_package_in_5_seconds/index.html


2013/12/12 Edgar Aichinger <[email protected]>

> oops , I didn't reply to the list...
> ----------  Weitergeleitete Nachricht  ----------
>
> Betreff: Re: [Denemo-devel] Help Needed
> Datum: Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2013, 19:29:55
> Von: Edgar Aichinger <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
>
> Am Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2013, 17:28:00 schrieb Richard Shann:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:13 +0100, Edgar Aichinger wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 12. Dezember 2013, 16:43:10 schrieb Richard Shann:
> > > > > OBS (created by openSUSE but called Open Build Service now) offers
> a convenient
> > > > > way for installing these generated binary/noarch packages (noarch
> is just a
> > > > > special case for packages that contain only human readable files
> and thus can
> > > > > be read on any architecture, like e.g. init scripts, and the user
> usually
> > > > > isn't even presented this detail when choosing something to
> install).
> > > > > There's a powerful search engine at http://search.opensuse.org/ -
> choose Build
> > > > > Service in the menu on the left, type denemo to the search bar and
> it comes up
> > > > > with a list of all available built and published packages, for any
> distro they
> > > > > exist for.
> > > >
> > > > Am I reading this correctly when it only says "unstable" for denemo
> for
> > > > all the versions of openSUSE. And does that mean that nothing
> "stable"
> > > > is available to users of that distro? I have a similar problem when I
> > > > visit the Debian site, it gives some 0.9 version as the version
> > > > available in all versions including "testing".
> > >
> > > I think in this context unstable simply means "not part of this
> official
> > > openSUSE release, but being built as part of some special
> > > project or a user's home project on OBS we're not responsible for".
> >
> > Is that to say official openSUSE releases have never included Denemo?
> > (As no version is listed under any release number ...)
>
> Yes. At least for the listed versions that seems true, and if there had
> been
> a official package i'd not bothered creating my own one, I rather would
> have
> sent bug reports to the package maintainer...  OBS users are encouraged to
> join
> forces and submit their changes back when they branch a package. for
> popular
> packages there's usually one "main development" location, people branch
> this,
> add their changes and when it works send a submit request back to the
> "main"
> location. the maintainer then decides to accept or reject. These are the
> rules
> openSUSE try to establish on "their" build service, note that the OBS
> itself is
> free software, so you could also install it at your own machine/network,
> run
> your own instance and use it how ever you want.
>
> Edgar
>
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>



-- 
Éloi Rivard - [email protected]

« On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel

Reply via email to