I would like to set up a non regression with your issue. Do you think running denemo with the following arguments, and checks that it is not killed, would be relevant ? denemo -n -a "(define foo \"bar\")"
2013/12/23 Richard Shann <[email protected]> > I have a revert of the change to the scheme trap handler code - is it ok > with you that I push this to git, as at the moment Denemo crashes for > some bad scheme uses? > (I have been pushing without this commit so far, which means that I am > not actually building and running quite what I push, and now I have > changes to view.c this becomes impossible, so it would help me continue > if I push this too: the make check will then fail on the check scheme > error test, unfortunately). > > Richard > > > On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 11:08 +0000, Richard Shann wrote: > > The scheme trapping of errors is broken > > If I put this in the CLI box > > (define abc "hello") > > > > it responds with "syntax error" in the console on a version from some > > time back and just kills Denemo instantly on the current version > > (current = git checkout a32f50f80539d05c5356d11d0bef5ee433dfe857) > > > > There must be two bugs here - the CLI box is broken for entering strings > > (I suspect) and the trapping is fatal to Denemo instead of returning. > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Denemo-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > -- Éloi Rivard - [email protected] « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
