On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 03:58 -0500, Bric wrote: > On 02/04/2014 01:06 AM, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > > > > dpkg -l libglib* > > > dpkg -l libglib* > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | > Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend > |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name Version Description > +++-===========================-===========================-====================================================================== > ii libglib-perl 1:1.222-1 Perl > interface to the GLib and GObject libraries > un libglib1.3 <none> (no description available) > un libglib1.3-data <none> (no description available) > un libglib1.3-dev <none> (no description available) > ii libglib2.0-0 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 The GLib > library of C routines > ii libglib2.0-cil 2.12.9-4 CLI binding > for the GLib utility library 2.12 > ii libglib2.0-data 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 Common files > for GLib library > ii libglib2.0-dev 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 Development files for > the GLib library
and so you glib is 2.24 but needs to be at least 2.28 for g_list_free_full() to be present. > un libglib2.0-doc <none> (no description available) > un libglibmm-2.4-1 <none> (no description available) > un libglibmm-2.4-1c2 <none> (no description available) > ii libglibmm-2.4-1c2a 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 C++ wrapper > for the GLib toolkit (shared libraries) > ii libglibmm-2.4-dev 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 C++ wrapper > for the GLib toolkit (development files) > un libglibmm-2.4-doc <none> (no description available) > un libglibmm2.3-dev <none> (no description available) > > > > This will tell you what version of glib you have. you may have luck > > with the linux binary? > > http://www.denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-0.0.0-0.linux-x86.tar.xz > > <http://www.denemo.org/%7Ejjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-0.0.0-0.linux-x86.tar.xz> > > > > You just uncompress it and execute the launcher script inside. If you > > do it at the command line you me know if there is an error. > > > > > > I ran the script ./Launch_Denemo.sh > > and the application launched (version 1.1.1). I didn't play with it > much (actually busy working on a score within 1.0.9, which was open > while I tried to open your 1.1.1), but just at a glance, it seemed to > perform comparably to the 1.0.9 > > Although (a digression), as I already whined about it a while back: I > would REALLY REALLY be happier if someone made the cursor animation > /optional/... i am still absolutely convinced that the animation is > slowing things down significantly for me. Given the number of times you > skip around, back and forth, the extra 900 milliseconds per "incident" > ;-)) adds up. I find the feature distracting and annoying, too. I > understand, as Richard has explained, it is supposed to solve the > problem of losing sight of your cursor, but can it PLEASE be optional? I thought we established that it was optional, you do Change Preferences and un-tick the first box, "Highlight the cursor", whereon the cursor is no longer highlighted and does not animate (IIRC). > > i think i've really strayed from the original topic now! well, there is obviously still a bug somewhere, as the animation is very fast on the various machines I have tried it on. IIRC I have seen the effect you refer to somewhere, but I don't recall when or where. Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
