I have not copied the binaries and the tarball over. Jeremiah
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 19:42 +0000, Stuart Binder wrote: > > I tried to get the Restructure branch to try it out, but it appears that > all the download links (including Sourcecode) > Jeremiah is going to move the binaries to the right place shortly. But > the Restructure branch is just source code ... > > Thanks for trying! > > Richard > > > are broken. I'm getting a 404 on every platform. > > > > Stuart > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard > Shann > > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:14 AM > > To: denemo <[email protected]> > > Subject: [Denemo-devel] A major re-structuring. > > > > One of the most fundamental mistakes made when Denemo was first started > was not to have a structure for a Denemo measure. Instead it is just a list > of the objects in the measure. As a knock on effect, nothing can be stored > with the measure that applies to the whole measure. > > This has made it difficult to fix the way that information about the > context (clef, timesignature ...) of an object is stored, especially when a > measure has no objects. It has long been my ambition to get rid of the way > the calculation of the context information is computed - a draw time. This > is still causing failures in Check Score on occasions. > > > > As a start I have created a branch Restructure in which a staff now has > a list of Measure structures, which for now just has one element, viz. > > the list of objects. > > > > I've done a first trawl of all the code to try and make the change work > properly, and I've tested (with the default build) loading files, starting > new files, adding and deleting movements, staffs, measures, notes, chords, > copy and paste creating snippets, pasting and following them Undo and Redo. > > > > It would not surprise me if I have missed something, it is perilous > work. The symptoms of an error are crashes, often with memory allocation > warnings. But, so far it seems good. If anyone can help testing this > version that would be good! > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Denemo-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel >
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
