I've always been puzzled that musical OCR is so difficult. It seems like a VERY constrained problem set compared to text. Small alphabet. Somewhat regular rules Not even a lot of typefaces.. Sure handwritten would be hard, and some advanced things might be difficult to detect/codify, but basic SATB, nothing more complex than 8th notes, ties, and repeats seems like it should be very straight forward.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:29:45 +0000, Richard Shann <rich...@rshann.plus.com > > > wrote: > > > If you do try these OCR programs out I would be *very* interested in the > > MusicXML generated for the attached PDF ... I tried Audiveris recently > > on this (that program - Audiveris - is supposed to be imminently getting > > an upgrade ... has been for months ...) to no very good effect. > > Results using SharpEye attached. > > AllPages.xml : MusicXML produced by SharpEye > AllPages.ly: result from musicxml2ly --npl --nsd --nb > AllPages.pdf: lilypond AllPages.ly > > Time spent: 4 minutes. > > -- Johan > _______________________________________________ > Denemo-devel mailing list > Denemo-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
