Am 20.01.2017 um 20:27 schrieb Richard Shann: > On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 08:45 +0000, Richard Shann wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 19:19 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: >>> Am 18.01.2017 um 11:50 schrieb Richard Shann: >>>> Is it the case that the Augmentum bug has no workaround yet? I could >>>> work on creating a Denemo version using markup. If so, which are the >>>> groups that need it? (I know about the \pes one, which was the one I >>>> reported to lilypond-user without success, but I guess there are >>>> others...) >>> >>> The lilypond documentation* says: >>> When an \augmentum dot appears at the end of the last staff within a >>> ligature, it is sometimes vertically placed wrong. As a workaround, add >>> an additional skip note (e.g., s8) as last note of the staff. >>> >>> I have tested that this really solves the issue. >> >> Ah, I didn't see that, even though I looked :( >> I see that it is needed before a Divisio Maior/Minor as well - it would >> seem that we could simply make the commands that insert these *always* >> insert an "s" for example >> >> s \divisioMinima >> >> works just fine, and doesn't show anything in the Denemo Display to >> puzzle the user. > > In fact, we could incorporate an "s" into our syntax emitted for > \augmentum, so that it was always present.
Hmm, due to the required order of commands that would be difficult -- as far as I have understood, the s has to be after corresponding \] and \melismaEnd. So I guess it'll be better to insert an s before the divisiones as you previously suggested. Andreas _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
