On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 09:40 +0100, Joe Wilkinson wrote: > I found the attachment and those notes give the unwanted result . But it > only leaves me more puzzled. The point was that the same chord E-F#-B
I should have gone one step further and merged the two bars, then you have your Asus2 and A4sus4sus2 right next to each other, and then you see that you have E-F#-B and E-F#-A not two identical chords. (Of course to make it a still more Minimal Working Example you could have started deleting the notes in the chord, eventually on deleting the B in one and the A in the other you would have got the same output and, backtracking realised they were different notes. Richard > in > the same music came up with the "Right" answer and then a much more > convoluted one. > > Joe > > On 06/04/2017 08:43, Richard Shann wrote: > > I should add that using the "Insert or Append Chords" palette would > > avoid the errors that are likely to arise if you enter the chords by > > hand, note-by-note. You just choose a duration and pitch and invoke the > > palette button for the chord you want. > > > > Richard > > > > On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:35 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 01:55 +0100, Joe Wilkinson wrote: > >>> Hi Richard, > >>> > >>> An odd quirk. > >>> > >>> The first movement of this tune has guitar accompaniment on fret 7 with > >>> Am shape followed by Asus2 (i.e. no first finger on the second string). > >>> > >>> To produce this I have put the chords E-G-B, and E F# B and printed > >>> transposed C to F. > >>> > >>> And it works most of the time. But in the Instrumental I get Am A > >>> 4sus4sus2 as in pdf. And I can't see why. I have tried reproducing it on > >>> a separate staff and there is no problem. Just thought you might like to > >>> have a look! :-) > >> What I did is to > >> Delete the second movement > >> Delete the second staff > >> Delete all the bars before the one with Am Asus2 > >> Delete bars with Del,m until the one with Am Asus4sus2 > >> Deleted the Am chords > >> > >> And I got the resultant problem cut down to something that made it > >> obvious - see attached! > >> > >> If ever you start using the LilyPond-user mailing list to help you out > >> of puzzles you will immediately be inundated with advice from many users > >> and they will all start by saying "please chop your example down to what > >> is essential to show the problem" - they even have a TLA for it, called > >> a MWE. However, you are better off sending it this list, as chopping > >> down raw LilyPond is much more hard work than chopping down with Denemo > >> - Denemo has extra verbiage in its LilyPond output which would obfuscate > >> the problem for them. > >> > >> > >> Richard > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Denemo-devel mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > >
JB2.denemo
Description: XML document
_______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
