however it can at
> least be easily worked around with split-measure command (although
> I'm pretty confident that you could come up with something that would
> fix that if it was seen as problematic from your point of view).
It sounds like you have spillover set - you want it off for this sort
of work. You can turn it off in your script or just turn it off via
Edit->Change Preferences
I don't think it is that spillover was set, it was off (but even when it is on,
I've been getting the same results, possibly because it is a 'paste' instead of
a note entry).
It is more that, in one instance, being at the beginning of a measure and
executing the command the way I set it up, with, albeit excessive code (Wasn't
able to get that shortened version you whipped up to work on first try), is
different from when the top measure already has a note in it, and that is
because it [the program] was told to move-cursor-left, which would be the
appropriate action if there was already a preceding note in the measure. So
basically, setting up the conditionals to run or omit the two left-moves if
cursor is at beginning of measure. Although something like that would be simple
for someone like you, I would have to ponder over it much to get it going.
There are other instances where script runs into little hiccups, and the
solution must [partly] be in asking certain questions about the measure
contents, where the cursor is, etc.
The other thing that might be useful, is to get user input of the duration to
be required for the new note on the upper staff, if that is possible (I think
you mentioned note duration requirement as a possibility, maybe that isn't what
you were saying though).
Anyways, thanks for reading my rambling. And just because I don't respond
adroitly to your code examples, that is mostly because it is taking a little
while to sink in, but it is good nevertheless.
Rain
_______________________________________________
Denemo-devel mailing list
Denemo-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
