On 01/10/15 08:39 AM, Daniel Sutcliffe wrote: >>>>>>> "DS" == Daniel Sutcliffe <d...@chairfour.com> writes: >> DS> I realized after I sent the above that the fact that systemd has >> DS> become almost ubiquitous is making it harder and harder to support >> DS> packages for EL6 and earlier and was thus am a lot less surprised >> DS> than I was when I first found this discrepancy. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> > wrote: >> Well, initscripts aren't that hard. > > This is very true, but when they have been removed from the > spec/src.rpm it makes the task more than the trivial tweaking and > rebuilding. > >> It's more about me not being able to remember what ancient python >> version is on which EL release, as well as having no way to actually test >> the package. > > That is always the headache, made easier in these days of > virtualization, but when it comes down to it there are just not enough > hours in the day. > >> The Fedora package will be using python3 once I get it updated, which >> cuts out EPEL (though EPEL7 does have some of python3 at this point). > > denyhosts 3 being focussed on python3 might explain the issue I am > currently seeing, but it might also just be a dependency thing. The > process runs for a bit and then falls over with some complaint about > TupleType ... This is probably not the thread or the place to really > discuss this though, this being the defunct denyhosts projects mailing > list. Where is the active forum/list for discussions on the new > GitHub/SFdenhost? > >> DS> I have just managed to produce a denyhosts-3.0-0.el6.noarch.rpm so >> DS> soon enough I shall have a better idea if my original issues are >> DS> going to be improved by this later version of denyhosts. >> >> Well, if you want to maintain denyhosts there, feel free to sign up. I >> can click all of the necessary buttons to give you access. > > I have no problem making my specs and RPMs available publically, not > sure how qualified they'll be to actually have them live in EPEL but > lets getting a working RPM first and think about where the spec > belongs later. I do welcome the opportunity to contribute to denyhosts > and/or EPEL whatever. > > Back on topic: although my 3.0 install isn't exactly fully functional > yet, I can already see that hosts-restricted is still getting 0 count > entries for attempted logins that aren't anything to do with > restricted-usernames - and checking the AGE_RESET_ bit of code I > suspect is causing this does not seem to contain any changes... > > Let's continue this discussion in a more relevant place though, please advise, > Cheers > /dan >
Dan, The TupleType error was pretty common in the pre-release package of DenyHost v3.0 (available on gitHub), but I think it had been fixed in the final 3.0 release which is available through the website. Jesse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Denyhosts-user mailing list Denyhosts-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/denyhosts-user
