I agree that ant is important for the Derby build process, but Eclipse gives me incremental building and other time-saving benefits. I do not want to wait minutes for ant to build Derby after changing only a few files. If anyone wants to commit the changes made in their IDE they should test if ant builds correctly first.
- Riad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel John Debrunner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:44 PM Subject: Re: Building Derby Using IDE > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Riad Al-Shaalan wrote: > > | I'm using Eclipse to build derby and noticed that the jdbc 2 and 3 > | classes are in the same package. Is there any consideration in placing > | them in their own unique package (i.e. org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc2 and > | org.apache.derby.jdbc3)? I think it would make the build setup (in > | Eclipse) easier. > > Can you setup Eclipse just to call ant and use the existing build rules? > Having to setup your own build rules in Eclipse just seems the wrong > approach to me, there is a chance separate build instructions will be > different and eventually lead to commits causing build errors when using > the "official" ant targets. > > Dan. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFBNe5KIv0S4qsbfuQRAle+AJ9yiB16JwEd9VO/YLo2gSaAVu7YNQCfSREf > HljEg9cdEiVfgj78qXZ+VPA= > =uasC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
