-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Khin, Gerald wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Daniel John Debrunner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>(snip) >> >>I'm not sure I understand what you mean by multiple systems. >>Can you give examples of the benefits of this? E.g. if app1 >>is using db1 and >>app2 is using db2 then what would be gained with two Derby >>systems over the single one that is supported today? > > > For example if app1 relies on that the derby.system.home points to > location1 and app2 wants derby.system.home to be set to location2.
It's an interesting idea, would require that every connection request through DriverManager include an attribute that indicates which system should be used. For a DataSource the system identifier could be a property. An alternate approach is to not rely on system functionality or system properties. Make the database self-contained, store properties within the database. This works today. Looking back, I think introducing a system concept for Cloudscape may have been a mistake. Dan. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBZWlYIv0S4qsbfuQRAnYsAKCUuAAsG451+MDrjiZPaLMtuZx3BACg2pUh ZEPRQC8apetV9wHAWpho27Y= =Nijw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
