I guess I was hoping I did not have the latest pre-release source. When the 'release' candidate was posted I downloaded the zip file and all files are extracted to a path of:
incubating-derby-10.0.2.1-src 96 files in this tree have 'IBM' in them and 23 have 'cloudscape'. Here are all of the files found by searching for 'confidential' in *.java files. These all have the IBM confidential comment I listed: package org.apache.derby.iapi.services.info ProductVersionHolder.java package org.apache.derby.iapi.sql.dictionary SchemaDescriptor.java package org.apache.derby.impl.sql.catalog SYSALIASESRowFactory.java SYSCHECKSRowFactory.java SYSCOLUMNSRowFactory.java SYSCONGLOMERATESRowFactory.java SYSCONSTRAINTSRowFactory.java SYSDEPENDSRowFactory.java SYSFOREIGNKEYSRowFactory.java SYSKEYSRowFactory.java SYSSCHEMASRowFactory.java SYSTABLESRowFactory.java SYSVIEWSRowFactory.java package org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data StoredPage.java ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel John Debrunner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Derby Development" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 4:25 PM Subject: Re: trunk version now 10.1.0.0 alpha / 10.0 branch created > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andrew McIntyre wrote: > > > > > On Dec 7, 2004, at 3:48 PM, RPost wrote: > > > >> Do comments like this one in > >> org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.data.StoredPage.java > >> need to be changed? I have seen similar comments in other files from the > >> 10.0.2.1 source. > >> > >> /* IBM Confidential > > > > > > Confidential notices should have been changed to IBM Copyright notices > > before the source was handed over to Apache, but apparently a few files > > slipped through. I'm guessing that any remaining Confidential notices > > should probably be changed over to the Apache license header by an IBM > > employee, but that is just my guess. Ken and/or Dan can provide an > > official answer to that question. > > Looks like my script handled some cases incorrectly, I'll look at fixing > them. > > Dan. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFBtkoUIv0S4qsbfuQRAh0mAJ0b+2AMdsNthgscd+zM7QJCf//xJACfWhIT > VDiYkgJfFYdU4rH0X8TV0NU= > =aN1Q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
