-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Seriously, if you believe that this is a real problem with performance, > prove it. This is a policy we have had in the geronimo project since > the beginning. There have been several times where people believed that > certain code was slow, tried to prove it, and it turned out it was > another chunk of code. Another way to look at it is to say what difference would it make to real world applications if you made this piece of code, say, ten times faster? Hopefully any well written JDBC application spends less than 1% of its time compiling SQL statements. The compile phase is made up of four stages, parse, bind, optimise and generate. Parse time is probably the quickest stage, let's say 15% of the compile time. So if your ten times improvement made parsing twice as fast, you will only improve overall performance by less than 0.1%. Traditionally performance work on Cloudscape mainly focussed on making execution time improvements, not compile time improvements. Dan. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB0G7YIv0S4qsbfuQRAjINAKCXGD1xnjiBHwut1cSUb4czjR/HKwCdHC9t wAt5N7d7p8oRaOVh8s0kjeE= =/ohv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
