--- Samuel Andrew McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > hello derby-dev, > > I was just browsing the latest Jira bugs on > documentation and realized > that if changes are made to document new features, > such as the recent > Intercept/Except addition, that we will no longer > have a valid set of > documentation for the 10.0 branch. I don't think > we're planning on > branching the website anytime soon, so... > > I would like to propose the following: save a copy > of the current > manuals from site/trunk/build/site to > code/branches/10.0/docs, and then > remove everything but the manuals directory and make > the rest of the > links on the front page point back to the project > website, as I did > with the doc set for the release. > > Any objections, comments, questions, or suggestions? > > andrew > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFB4z4bDfB0XauCH7wRAicEAJ9rTX2B635/49ZuL9A98a4m5D0etACfUQqy > cg7hQ80KIDxIkeCEjLQKtCU= > =fsKI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >
I think thats a good idea. With the eventual move to DITA source, I think it would be good to keep a branch of the original source docs as a 10.0 branch, because of the large amount of change (to the formatting, not necessarily the content) that is occurring with re-sourcing. Also, I dont mind hitting some of these jira doc issues while I'm creating the DITA source; I'm already in the docs, I might as well fix some of the bugs while I'm at it. If anyone has any concerns/objections about that, please let me know.
