Mike wrote: > I saw on your site you mention an issue with derby, XA, branch and > single phase commit. Could you file a derby issue for this if you > believe the derby implementation does not meet jdbc and XA specification
I have checked the XA specification and to my chagrin (for I hate to be wrong ;-), Derby is right and I am wrong. The documentation for xa_commit() says: "All associations for *xid must have been ended by using xa_end() with TMSUCCESS set in flags." The good thing is that it builds my confidence in Derby's XA implementation. As I test more of Derby's XA functionality, I will report my findings. I will remove the erroneous statement from my issues list. Regards Dibyendu
