Andrew McIntyre wrote:
...
- derby/site: Jean had a reason for not keeping them in derby/site. If
I remember correctly it has to do with forrest, in that the
documentation on the website should be brought in as a build product
from elsewhere in order to simplify the website build. she can
elaborate.
...

Building the web site is an all or nothing deal -- there's no partial build. So, every time you do a "forrest site", it regenerates all 748 files that currently comprise the manuals. (And it needs to be this way because it can be difficult at face value to predict the effect of a seemingly simple change on other pages in the web site.) Depending on the specific change, processor speed, memory, and whatever else might be happening on the system, it can take 15 minutes (2.2 GHz processor / 2 GB ram) or 60 minutes (330 MHz processor / 1 GB ram).


The docs change rarely. It doesn't make sense to regenerate all pages each time there's a change to the web site. Especially since early feedback indicated that some users feel that the current organization is undesirable. For that lengthy thread start at http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200410.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Another nit I have is managing such a high number of files in forrest increases the size and complexity of the forrest site.xml file. For details, see: http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200410.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-jean

Reply via email to