On Mar 6, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
No, we require the class files modified to be sub-classed (see my other long e-mail from this morning) and there is no issue with it.
For some reason I had it in my head that any subclass would know that its superclass was abstract, and that subclassing a class that was once abstract, but now concrete, would lead to problems. This is not the case, of course, since the subclass has no record of the superclass' abstract status.
Attached is a patch to build with JDK 1.4.2 only. This works as expected when running under JDK 1.4.2. However, when I attempt to use the jars created with this build with JDK 1.3.1, I get a NoSuchMethodError on a select (create table and insert works fine). What have I missed here?
andrew
jdk142compile.patch
Description: Binary data
