+1 for #2
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:50:43 -0800, Andrew McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recently, a vote was approved that the source for the Derby > documentation should be XML DITA format. Details can be found in these > threads: > > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200502.mbox/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200503.mbox/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > These source files should now be stored in the Subversion repository. > Please vote on one of the following locations to store the source: > > 1 - in derby/code, with each branch getting its own copy of the source > as applicable, in docs/src > > 2 - in derby/docs, a new module with a similar trunk/branches/tags > layout underneath to easily match the version of the documentation to > the corresponding code. > > 3 - a hybrid approach, with the source checked in to derby/code, and > the remaining files necessary to build the docs in derby/docs as > suggested here: > > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200503.mbox/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > After reviewing the source, which comprises almost 1100 files (nearly > as many as the engine!), and will have its own building requirements, I > am now thinking that everyone will be happier if the docs are managed > separately from either the code or the website. > > My +1 vote goes to option 2. > > andrew > >
