Hi Jeff,

I think another important item would be something along the lines of the document build date; ie:
"Derby Document build: some ISO date type timestamp here".
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt


Derby Document build: 2005-03-21T16:00Z : 21 March 2005  or March 21 2005

I don't agree with much of anything dealing with time/dates/timezones, but adding the month and day in text at least removes some of the confusion, possibly more if doing multiple languages... Some type of timestamp would allow people to re-cycle documentation that tends to get stale, with a date being self documenting. I would guess the title page might be a good location(?).

OR
whatever timestamp works :-)  Until things get more stable.

Possibly some other method would work better.

scott

Jeff Levitt wrote:

Until Jean gets the PDF's up, I have placed the PDF's
on my own personal website at:

http://derby.mylevita.com

No zip file, because I want to update each of them
separately as I make updates to my modified xsl file.

Please email me suggestions for improving the PDF's! Items already on my list:

- Chapter titles at top left of each page
- Table cell formatting
- Index
- Widows and orphans (when a topic title is at the
bottom of one page and the rest of the content is at
the top of the next page)
- Linking (currently some links go to blank page
BEFORE a topic target, instead of directly to the
target)


--- "Jean T. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I can put pdfs on the web site tomorrow (probably)
after infrastructure upgrades are complete.


 -jean

scott hutinger wrote:
...


I would agree that DITA output should be on the


site without the need to

build the docs. One might explain that the output


is in a state of flux

(will change) for a while. I would agree with


Anthony that expecting

people to build the output is a bit much.

scott










Reply via email to