Hi Jeff,
I think another important item would be something along the lines of the document build date; ie:
"Derby Document build: some ISO date type timestamp here".
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt
Derby Document build: 2005-03-21T16:00Z : 21 March 2005 or March 21 2005
I don't agree with much of anything dealing with time/dates/timezones, but adding the month and day in text at least removes some of the confusion, possibly more if doing multiple languages... Some type of timestamp would allow people to re-cycle documentation that tends to get stale, with a date being self documenting. I would guess the title page might be a good location(?).
OR whatever timestamp works :-) Until things get more stable.
Possibly some other method would work better.
scott
Jeff Levitt wrote:
Until Jean gets the PDF's up, I have placed the PDF's on my own personal website at:
http://derby.mylevita.com
No zip file, because I want to update each of them separately as I make updates to my modified xsl file.
Please email me suggestions for improving the PDF's! Items already on my list:
- Chapter titles at top left of each page - Table cell formatting - Index - Widows and orphans (when a topic title is at the bottom of one page and the rest of the content is at the top of the next page) - Linking (currently some links go to blank page BEFORE a topic target, instead of directly to the target)
--- "Jean T. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can put pdfs on the web site tomorrow (probably)
after infrastructure upgrades are complete.
-jean
scott hutinger wrote:
...
I would agree that DITA output should be on thesite without the need to
build the docs. One might explain that the outputis in a state of flux
(will change) for a while. I would agree withAnthony that expecting
people to build the output is a bit much.
scott
