+1
--- Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad > karma to have our logo under such a cloud of > suspicion. So I would like to call a vote to > reject this tally. I've heard lots of great ideas > on how to resolve this issue either technologically > or socially but I think first we need to establish > that this tally is incorrect. Then if we agree to > reject, ensuing discussions can determine how to > best choose a logo. > > > Logo 32 = 20 votes > > Logo 35 = 12 votes > > None of the above = 18 votes > > > Vote > +1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo > is determined by the community. > -1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as > is with 32 as the winner. > > > Thanks > > Kathey > > >
