Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Have we received a software grant yet from IBM that covers this code, or > a formal statement from them that this is covered by the original grant? > > Until this is resolved I do not believe we can accept this contribution.
Agreed, but I think we can continue to vote on this, while the legalities are being resolved. But we are also waiting for Geir to reply to the question below from Ken. Dan. ------------------------ Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> You will need to get an additional CCLA or Software Grant for this. My >> recollection is that IBM prefers the new adjusted CCLA (with >> incorporated SG). Do we actually? By whose requirement, Apache's or IBM's? If IBM feels that the client code drop is covered by the initial Derby CCLA, isn't that sufficient? - -- #ken P-)}
