If it were a simple static long that starts at 1 and increments each time a new connection instance is created (yes, the increment would have to be synchronized), then it would be much more readable. This would also be more portable to the client code, and we wouldn't have to cut/paste the UUID class to the client packages...
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
David
David Van Couvering wrote:
Hi, Kathey. Currently the connection classes don't appear to have a unique identifier that could be made available in toString(). Do I take it you would like me to find an approach that generates one?
I noticed Derby has a UUID service (very nice!). Is it OK if I use that here to generate a UUID for the connection? If I don't hear otherwise, I'll assume this approach is OK, e.g.
public class EmbedConnection { private UUID UUIDValue; private String UUIDString;
public EmbedConnection() { UUIDFactory uuidFactory = Monitor.getMonitor().getUUIDFactory(); UUIDValue = uuidFactory.createUUID(); UUIDString = this.getClass().getName() + ":" + UUIDValue.toString(); ... }
public String toString() { UUIDString; } }
=====
The connection classes I found are as follows. Please let me know if I missed any. An indented class implies it extends the unindented class above it.
EMBEDDED (org.apache.derby.engine.*) BrokeredConnection (implements java.sql.Connection) BrokeredConnection30 EmbedConnection (implements java.sql.Connection) EmbedConnection30 EmbedPooledConnection (implements java.sql.PooledConnection) EmbedXAConnection
CLIENT (org.apache.derby.client.*_ Connection (abstract class, implements java.sql.Connection)) NetConnection NetXAConnection ClientXAConnection (implements java.sql.XAConnection) ClientPooledConnection (implements java.sql.PooledConnection) LogicalConnection (implements java.sql.Connection)
On the client side, I first need to understand: is derbyclient.jar supposed to be standalone (meaning it can't depend upon things in derby.jar like the Monitor and the UUID class). If so, I suppose I could cut/paste the BasicUUID class into the client packages for use on the client side (shiver). Alternately we could have a derbyutils.jar that is shared between client and server (Big Change, not sure if I want to take that on). Advice here would be most appreciated.
Thanks,
David
Kathey Marsden (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-243?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-243: ---------------------------------
Summary: connection toString should uniquely identify the connection (was: connection toString doesn't give enough information)
Description: The toString() on the Derby connection doesn't print unique information.
for example System.out.println(conn) prints:
EmbedConnection in the case of derby embedded
It would be great if the toString() method for connections could be used to differentiate one connection from another.
was: The toString() on the Derby connection doesn't print unique information. for example System.out.println(conn) prints: EmbedConnection in the case of derby embedded
I am not sure if XA Connections and Pooled Connections have the same issue. I didn't immediately see an override of the toString() method in BrokeredConnection.java like there is for EmbedConnection
connection toString should uniquely identify the connection -----------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-243 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-243 Project: Derby Type: Improvement Components: JDBC Reporter: Kathey Marsden Assignee: David Van Couvering Priority: Trivial Fix For: 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.0, 10.0.2.2, 10.1.0.0
The toString() on the Derby connection doesn't print unique information.
for example System.out.println(conn) prints:
EmbedConnection in the case of derby embedded
It would be great if the toString() method for connections could be used to differentiate one connection from another.
