I was looking to see if "++" was atomic (as I suspected it's not) and I found this very interesting article from the Blue Guys about java.util.concurrent.atomic in JDK 1.5. I am not an expert in locking, but this looked very interesting. Has anybody looked at this? Could Derby take advantage of this?

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp11234/

David

Reply via email to