My apologies, I didn't notice that Satheesh had already assigned it to himself.
Mamta :( On 4/29/05, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lance J. Andersen wrote: > > > Sorry, I assumed when Mamta sent the email that it was the intent for > > someone to take this over. > > > I can reassign this back to Satheesh if you like. > > Nothing to do with me. :-) > > > I just assumed it was unassigned given the email was sent out. I did > > noticce when I assigned it that it showed Satheesh as the owner. > > As Satheesh said I was just trying to cover the general case. I think a > lot of us are new to open source and we do need to define some ground > rules around assignment of bugs. Something like > > - if you are actively working on a Jira issue then assign it to yourself > or ask someone on the derby-dev list to assign to you. > > - if you are not actively working on a Jira issue then either unassign > it, or don't assign it to yourself. If you have made some progress on > it, then make some comment to that effect in the Jira entry > > - if you want to help out on an assigned Jira issue, volunteer on the > list to help out > > Of course anyone can work on any Jira issue that they want to, even if > it is assigned to another person, but that's their choice, to possibly > duplicate effort. > > Dan. > >
