Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
My vote is for:

a) stick with what is done now and use our own versions
d) have the build include the library content in derby.jar
e) if using an external product could really save effort - and help avoid reineventing large amounts of code, then the proposed product should be subjected to a vote.

Sorry, I did not mean d).
I think it would be nice if all dependencies are distributed along with Derby, but not in derby.jar.


Regards



Reply via email to