Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] accept derby client contribution

[Jean T. Anderson]

Since it has its own table of contents, which forrest wants to generate, 
I recommend posting it as is (like Sunitha's paper at 
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/DOTS_Derby.html). If you let forrest 
process it, I'm not quite sure what you'll end up with.

 -jean
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
Hi Susan,
Thanks for taking this up. I am OK with your suggestion. Should it be 
forrest generated or posted as is? May be we could put the current 
version for now and then modify it later? ;-)

Satheesh
Susan Cline wrote:
Hi Satheesh,
 
I can get this ready for Jean to commit.
 
I was thinking it could go under the 'Papers' tab, 
http://incubator.apache.org/derby/papers/index.html,
and we could create a new category called 'Derby Network Client'.  It 
wouldn't be
appropriate under the 'Derby Engine' section.  Or, we could have a new 
'Functional Spec'
category where any future Functional Spec for anything could go as well.
 
Do either of those sound okay?  If not, please suggest where you would 
like the functional
spec to go.
 
Susan

*/Satheesh Bandaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
    Submitted Derby client source to trunk. Post any problems you notice
    with Derby client.
    Enjoy! Please use the functional spec for usage. I will work with Jean
    to host it at Derby website.
    Satheesh