[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-260?page=comments#action_64998 ] Roland Beuker commented on DERBY-260: -------------------------------------
Hello Sunitha, I am arranging a Hyperthreating or Multiprocessor target to do some tests (the initial target was from one of our customers...). I also got a reaction from developerworks: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/dw_thread.jsp?forum=370&thread=80481 Both your and their reaction is that Cloudscape/Derby should work on a multi-processor target. This could mean a problem with Hibernate instead of the Java database. At this moment I don't have any specific details next to the fact that databases get/set statements where not working right when Hyperthreating was enabled on the target platform. The problem disappeared when I switched of Hyperthreating in the bios from the target platform. Regards, Roland Beuker > Derby is not stable on multiprocessor or Hyperthreating architectures. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-260 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-260 > Project: Derby > Type: Bug > Environment: P4 3GHz with Hyperthreating, 512 Mb, WIN2000 > Reporter: Roland Beuker > > Hello, > I am using IBM Cloudscape Version 10.0 with Hibernate and it works great. But > at the time I was deploying my project on a target with a Hyperthreating CPU > things went wrong (database very unstable). It seems that Cloudscape is not > functioning on multiprocessor or Hyperthreating architectures. Has anyone > some more information? > Regards, > Roland Beuker -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
